Provincial Privacy Laws in Canada: Every Province and Territory Compared
Which law protects your personal information, and which office hears your complaint, changes at every provincial border. The table below covers all ten provinces and three territories.
Last verified: 2026-09-05
Why the province matters
Where a person lives decides which privacy law protects them and, just as importantly, which office takes the complaint. Canada has no single privacy regulator. The federal Privacy Commissioner handles federal government institutions and, through PIPEDA, businesses across most of the country. Everything else is provincial: every province and territory has its own access and privacy statute for public bodies, most have a dedicated health-information statute, and three have their own private-sector law that displaces PIPEDA entirely.
The practical consequence is that two people with identical complaints can end up in different places. A complaint about a retailer in Halifax goes to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada under PIPEDA. The same complaint about a retailer in Calgary goes to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta under that province's Personal Information Protection Act, because the federal government declared it substantially similar in 2004. A complaint about a hospital goes to the provincial regulator almost everywhere, since health custodians answer to a provincial health-information statute rather than to PIPEDA.
The table below sets out all thirteen jurisdictions on one screen: what covers the private sector, what covers government bodies, what covers health records, and the office that hears the complaint. Every cell was checked against the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's own list of provincial and territorial privacy laws and oversight bodies on 5 September 2026.
| Province or territory | Private-sector law | Public-sector law | Health-information law | Oversight body |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberta | Personal Information Protection Act — declared substantially similar to PIPEDA (SOR/2004-219) | Protection of Privacy Act (POPA) | Health Information Act | Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta |
| British Columbia | Personal Information Protection Act — declared substantially similar to PIPEDA (SOR/2004-220) | Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act | E-Health (Personal Health Information Access and Protection of Privacy) Act | Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia |
| Manitoba | PIPEDA applies | Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Personal Health Information Act | Manitoba Ombudsman |
| New Brunswick | PIPEDA applies | Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Personal Health Information Privacy and Access Act — declared substantially similar for health custodians (SOR/2011-265) | Ombud for New Brunswick |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | PIPEDA applies | Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Personal Health Information Act and the Pharmacy Network Regulations — declared substantially similar for health custodians (SI/2012-72) | Information and Privacy Commissioner |
| Nova Scotia | PIPEDA applies | Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Privacy Review Officer Act | Personal Health Information Act — declared substantially similar for health custodians (SOR/2016-62) | Information and Privacy Commissioner |
| Ontario | PIPEDA applies | Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 — declared substantially similar for health custodians (SOR/2005-399) | Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario |
| Prince Edward Island | PIPEDA applies | Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Health Information Act | Information and Privacy Commissioner |
| Quebec | Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, as amended by Law 25 — declared substantially similar to PIPEDA (SOR/2003-374) | Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information | Act respecting health services and social services, Health Insurance Act, and Act respecting the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec | Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec |
| Saskatchewan | PIPEDA applies | Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Health Information Protection Act | Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner |
| Northwest Territories | PIPEDA applies | Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Health Information Act | Information and Privacy Commissioner |
| Nunavut | PIPEDA applies | Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act | No separate health-information statute is listed by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada | Information and Privacy Commissioner |
| Yukon | PIPEDA applies | Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act | Health Information Privacy and Management Act | Yukon Information and Privacy Commissioner |
This table scrolls sideways. Drag or shift-scroll it to see every column.
Your jurisdiction in detail
- Ontario
Privacy Rights in Ontario
How FIPPA, MFIPPA, PHIPA, and federal law combine to protect Ontarians from provincial ministries to hospitals and school boards.
Read topic - Quebec
Privacy Rights in Quebec (Law 25)
Quebec has Canada's strongest private-sector privacy law after the 2021 reforms in Law 25, with mandatory breach reporting and a right to data portability.
Read topic - British Columbia
Privacy Rights in British Columbia
BC's PIPA applies to most private-sector organizations, while FIPPA covers public bodies. The Information and Privacy Commissioner for BC oversees both.
Read topic - Alberta
Privacy Rights in Alberta
Alberta has its own private-sector privacy law (PIPA), public-sector access and privacy laws, and a health privacy law (HIA), all overseen by the OIPC Alberta.
Read topic - Saskatchewan
Privacy Rights in Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan does not have a private-sector privacy law. PIPEDA applies to businesses. FOIP and LA FOIP cover public bodies, and HIPA covers health information.
Read topic - Manitoba
Privacy Rights in Manitoba
Manitoba's FIPPA covers public bodies, PHIA covers health information, and PIPEDA fills the private-sector gap. Complaints go to the Manitoba Ombudsman.
Read topic - New Brunswick
Privacy Rights in New Brunswick
New Brunswick's RTIPPA covers public bodies and PHIPAA covers health information. Since 2019 both are overseen by the Ombud New Brunswick.
Read topic - Nova Scotia
Privacy Rights in Nova Scotia
Nova Scotia's FOIPOP covers public bodies, PHIA covers health information, and Municipal Government Act access provisions apply to municipalities.
Read topic - Prince Edward Island
Privacy Rights in Prince Edward Island
PEI's FOIPP covers provincial public bodies and designated municipalities, and the Health Information Act covers health custodians.
Read topic - Newfoundland and Labrador
Privacy in Newfoundland and Labrador
ATIPPA, 2015 covers provincial public bodies. PHIA covers health custodians. The OIPC makes recommendations under both, with a court-filing route under ATIPPA, 2015.
Read topic - Yukon
Privacy Rights in Yukon
Yukon's ATIPP Act covers territorial public bodies and health information custodians, with the Ombudsman acting as the Information and Privacy Commissioner.
Read topic - Northwest Territories
Privacy in the Northwest Territories
NWT's ATIPP covers territorial public bodies, while HIA applies to health custodians. The NWT Information and Privacy Commissioner oversees both.
Read topic - Nunavut
Privacy Rights in Nunavut
Nunavut's ATIPP covers the Government of Nunavut and its public bodies, including the Department of Health. Nunavut has its own Information and Privacy Commissioner.
Read topic
Frequently asked questions about provincial privacy law
- Which provinces have their own private-sector privacy law instead of PIPEDA?
- Three: Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia. Each has a private-sector statute the federal government declared substantially similar to PIPEDA under paragraph 26(2)(b), by SOR/2003-374 for Quebec, SOR/2004-219 for Alberta and SOR/2004-220 for British Columbia. In those provinces an ordinary business answers to the provincial law and the provincial regulator for its intra-provincial activity. Everywhere else the private sector is covered by PIPEDA and complaints go to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. PIPEDA still applies in all three provinces to federally regulated businesses such as banks, airlines, railways and telecoms, and to information that crosses a provincial or national border.
- Who regulates privacy in my province?
- Ten of the thirteen jurisdictions have a dedicated information and privacy commissioner: Alberta, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec (the Commission d'accès à l'information), Saskatchewan, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Yukon. Two use an ombudsman office instead: Manitoba, where the Manitoba Ombudsman handles access and privacy, and New Brunswick, where the Ombud for New Brunswick does. Each office is listed with its official website in the table above. Complaints to any of them are free.
- Does my province have a separate law for health records?
- In most cases yes. Ontario has PHIPA, Alberta the Health Information Act, Saskatchewan the Health Information Protection Act, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador the Personal Health Information Act, New Brunswick the Personal Health Information Privacy and Access Act, Prince Edward Island the Health Information Act, the Northwest Territories the Health Information Act and Yukon the Health Information Privacy and Management Act. British Columbia's health-specific statute is the E-Health Act, and Quebec's health privacy rules sit inside its health services, health insurance and RAMQ statutes. The Privacy Commissioner of Canada lists no separate health-information statute for Nunavut. The Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador health laws have been declared substantially similar to PIPEDA for health custodians.
- Does provincial privacy law cover my employer, or does the federal one?
- It depends on the employer, not on the province. Federally regulated employers, meaning banks, airlines, railways, interprovincial trucking firms, telecoms and broadcasters, are covered by PIPEDA for employee information wherever they operate. Employees of provincially regulated private businesses are covered by the provincial private-sector law in Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia, since those statutes reach employee personal information. In the other seven provinces and the three territories there is no general private-sector privacy statute governing an ordinary employer's handling of employee records, because PIPEDA reaches employee information only for federal works, undertakings and businesses. Public-sector employees are covered by their jurisdiction's access and privacy statute.
Not sure which commissioner to contact?
If you are unsure which law applies to your complaint, start with our commissioner picker tool or review our federal laws overview to see how PIPEDA, the Privacy Act, and CASL interact with provincial regimes.